Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [67.20.112.52] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.6)
  with HTTP id 2714449 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 20:29:27 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: good news (speed) / bad news (resonance)
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.6
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 20:29:27 -0500
Message-ID: <web-2714449@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <3FAC157C.7080000@ieee.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Charles R. Patton" <charles.r.patton@ieee.org>:

Scott,
Thinking back on my aeileron counterweight resonance with the engine speed, is 
it possible that the resonance is due to elevator push-pull tube tension? 
  Your comment about engine speed seems the most telling to me.  During climb, 
the tension on the push-pull tube is different than in level flight.  It is 
easy to imagine that going in and out of resonance.  A simple test would be to 
take a bungee cord and pull at right angles on the tube at mid-span and see if 
the characteristics of the hum change.

Charles Patton
360JM