Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:47:30 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from www.dynacomm.ws ([198.22.63.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 2713775 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:27:16 -0500 Received: from dynacomm.ws (adsl-68-248-34-241.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [68.248.34.241]) by www.dynacomm.ws (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id hA7FQLo13329; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:26:22 -0500 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:26:19 -0500 Subject: Re: LNC2 NACA air ducts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) X-Original-Cc: "Angier M. Ames" X-Original-To: Lancair List From: "Lorn H. Olsen" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) > Several builders have remarked that at low air speeds there is very > little flow of air from these ducts into the cockpit and that in some > instances, air is actually sucked OUT. Do any of you think that air > flow into the cockpit could be improved through these ducts if the > various openings in the cockpit closeout ribs could be sealed off with > boots? > > Angier Ames I have no leaks in my cockpit. I have sealed, with old inner-tube, all of the holes into my cockpit and put 1/4" foam around the canopy for the winter. My NACA cockpit vents work very well at all speeds even high speed taxi. As a matter of fact, in flight, about 60% of my cockpit noise is from the NACA air inputs. You can see the approximate location of my scoops at: http://www.dynacomm.ws/~lorn/ -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, DynaComm, Corp. 248-478-4300, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.ws LNC2, O-320-D1F, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan