Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 14:22:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from www.dynacomm.ws ([198.22.63.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 2712671 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 14:11:03 -0500 Received: from dynacomm.ws (adsl-68-248-34-241.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [68.248.34.241]) by www.dynacomm.ws (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id hA6JATa20199; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 14:10:30 -0500 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 14:10:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Ohm's law Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) X-Original-Cc: "ian crowe" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" From: "Lorn H. Olsen" In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) > . > . > I have an low voltage light that is too bright. > . > . > Ian Crowe, C-FKRO, LC2 90 odd hours and counting Why don't you just get a bulb with less wattage. If I had a light in my house that was 200 watts and was too bright, I would just put in a 100 or 150 watt bulb. What is wrong with my thinking? -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, DynaComm, Corp. 248-478-4300, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.ws LNC2, O-320-D1F, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan