Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 07:19:01 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 2711918 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:02:23 -0500 Received: from comcast.net (h0050e4f9850f.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.34.165.190]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <2003110605021901300rmo58e> (Authid: n4zq); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 05:02:19 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <3FA9A6ED.1090601@comcast.net> Disposition-Notification-To: "Angier M. Ames" X-Original-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 01:42:05 +0000 From: "Angier M. Ames" Reply-To: N2811a@comcast.net Organization: Alpha Delta Research User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: LNC2 NACA air ducts References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Several builders have remarked that at low air speeds there is very little flow of air from these ducts into the cockpit and that in some instances, air is actually sucked OUT. Do any of you think that air flow into the cockpit could be improved through these ducts if the various openings in the cockpit closeout ribs could be sealed off with boots? Angier Ames