Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.167.117] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.6)
  with HTTP id 2702932 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:48:38 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] lml  RAM AIR in 320
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.6
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:48:38 -0500
Message-ID: <web-2702932@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <001501c39ef3$5bd51a80$710cb1cf@denny63ea7z29i>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Denny" <d.duello@www.mebbs.com>:

D,

I'm designing a Ram Air system for an injected 360 using a very low
restriction Kand N automotive racing filter , and am considering the problem
of filter icing/need for alternate air.  Please tell me more re, "Ram Air in
icing conditions would be a very bad idea".  There's carb heat for a
carbureted engine, what about injected?  Will you share your ideas about
"filtered pseudo ram air"?

Denny

> Air in icing conditions would be a very bad idea.  I'm sure you could
> fabricate a 'filtered pseudo ram air' without too much loss of
> performance, and would require no pilot action.