Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:22:23 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r04.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.100] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2646821 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:53:55 -0400 Received: from Epijk@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.1a1.1be9e074 (25914) for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:53:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Epijk@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1a1.1be9e074.2cc7f3f7@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:53:43 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Horsepower Calculation X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1a1.1be9e074.2cc7f3f7_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10708 --part1_1a1.1be9e074.2cc7f3f7_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/21/03 9:20:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Sky2high@aol.com writes: > Just look at the 75% power entries in most POHs and see if the formula is > close enough. > Scott: I agree completely that the equation I submitted is certainly close enough. I think I said it produces an APPROXIMATION which doesn't take atmospheric variables into account, and which requires the correct figures to be used (like rated RPM instead of 2700 and rated MAP instead of 29). What stimulated my response was the fact that the original posted equation did not produce HP. Thanks. Jack Kane --part1_1a1.1be9e074.2cc7f3f7_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 10/21/= 03 9:20:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Sky2high@aol.com writes:


Just look at the 75% power entr= ies in most POHs and see if the formula is close enough.


Scott:

I agree completely that the equation I submitted is certainly close enough.=20= I think I said it produces an APPROXIMATION which doesn't take atmospheric v= ariables into account, and which requires the correct figures to be used (li= ke rated RPM instead of 2700 and rated MAP instead of 29).

What stimulated my response was the fact that the original posted equation d= id not produce HP.

Thanks.
Jack Kane --part1_1a1.1be9e074.2cc7f3f7_boundary--