Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:35:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r08.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2636715 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:34:48 -0400 Received: from PTACKABURY@aol.com by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.144.1a89f3ba (4418) for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:31:44 -0400 (EDT) From: PTACKABURY@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <144.1a89f3ba.2cbda91e@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:31:42 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: To supercharge or not to supercharge X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10705 Rick: You missed the real point: Of course a supercharged Legacy can throttle back to 30 inches of boost at what ever test points Tim et al wish--the trick will be for their normally aspirated factory Legacy to maintain 30 inches of MP as it climbs to 8k, 12k , 17k, etc. regards, paul