Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.173.216.66] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.5)
  with HTTP id 2631699 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:57:31 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IV-P  IFR training
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.5
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:57:31 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2631699@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031010.102627.-16724765.3.Earl_Schroeder@juno.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for earl_schroeder@juno.com:

I only have a 235/320 so perhaps I don't belong in this discussion.  I am
IFR rated. (I had the rating before completing the Lancair) I agree with
everything John has said.
However, I'm very hesitant to fly much IFR in my glass airplane without
any lightning 'protection'.  We have discussed the lightning 'threat'
previously several times so I will not rehash it.   Am I the only one
with these concerns?  If so, how to y'all rationalize those concerns
away?  The low benign cloud/fog layer is reason enough to hold the
rating.  Earl