Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.mindspring.com ([207.69.200.64]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 17:39:02 -0500 Received: from triton (user-38h1sv0.dialup.mindspring.com [209.16.243.224]) by smtp4.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA04779 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 17:41:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001601be74b4$b4de37b0$0113a8c0@triton> From: "Brock Brinkerhoff" To: Subject: LC20 - COM Antenna Location VHF-5T Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 16:38:28 -0600 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ok - I'll quit lurking and ask the question I've had for some time now. I have a 235 with an O-290-D2. It had an antenna mounted in the aft fuse, but every time I keyed the mic I would get tons of interference on all of the electrical engine gauges (tach would peg, oil temp would read 30 higher and so on.) I removed the antenna from the fuse, and by accident found out that if I attached a wire, about 24 inches long to the antenna's ground plane (which after the fact I learned was MISERABLY too small), it worked fine, and without interference - but - It would only work this way if the wire was pulled back towards to panel (I know this sounds crazy, but it's true). So, I shopped around for an antenna and found one that Aircraft Spruce has in their catalogue (VHF-5T). It is meant to be placed inside the aft fuse, mounted flat. The antenna itself resembles a strip of fiberglass about 1 inch wide by 30 inches. The nice thing about it was that it did not require a ground plane, but (little did I know) it needed to be mounted as close to vertical (or a max of 45 degrees from vertical) to be most effective. Of course (using hindsight) using the vertical positioning makes sense, but since the airplane is already complete, I cannot think of a single place to stick this antenna to get the required mounting position for it to be effective. Now, I'm not completely stuck with mounting this antenna, as I would take anything that worked right and did not cause RF interference with the gauges. Any suggestions? Brock Brinkerhoff 290DM