Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 18:32:44 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from news.vallnet.com ([206.25.206.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP-TLS id 2562693 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 16:08:55 -0400 Received: from nemisis.vallnet.com ([206.25.206.1]) by news.vallnet.com with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.22) id 19tC1l-0005wV-WC for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:08:54 -0500 Received: from secure.vallnet.com ([206.25.206.55] helo=vallnet.com) by nemisis.vallnet.com with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 19tC1d-0007e1-EM for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:08:45 -0500 X-Original-Sender: gwolf@vallnet.com From: gwolf@vallnet.com Reply-to: gwolf@vallnet.com X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Grounding ground planes X-Mailer: WebMAIL to Mail Gateway v3.0m X-Original-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:08:45 -0500 Priority: normal X-Original-Message-id: <3f51044d.47f1.1372@vallnet.com> X-VallNet-Scanner: ae98a90e85b19a4e62eeece65d8dbc4e Regarding all this talk on ground planes - should the ground plane itself be grounded to the common ground of the IV-P, or left isolated? Thanks. Gary Wolf IV-P,V8 (135 hours)