Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 09:15:56 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailsweeper.carle.com ([199.184.120.183] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2562386 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 03:38:41 -0400 Received: from ns1.carle.com (ns1.carle.com) by mailsweeper.carle.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 02:28:54 -0500 Received: by ns1.carle.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3RF8DF4M>; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 02:38:35 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: From: "Benjamin.Welch" X-Original-To: "'lml@lancaironline.net'" Subject: WX-500 X-Original-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 02:38:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Does anyone have a Lancair IVP that they've installed a WX-500 Stormscope in that they can say honestly works? Lancair Avionics installed mine. It is controlled by my Sandel unit and I cannot say it ever really worked. I can have it displayed on the Sandel, Garmin 430 or Avrotek Avidyne Flight Monitor. Initially, I just got alot of noise artifact. I worked with the Lancair Avionics fellow who installed it and have been out to Oregon for my anuals and have worked on ensuring the unit is grounded putting an aluminum mesh down in the floor of the tail. I have a static wick system installed on the plane but cannot say that it works as there is no fraying of the ends of the static wicks but there is leading edge tiny wing and horiz. stab. paint craters forming when in IMC. It is at times like that that I have had two OAT probes fail and twice the rudder indicator in my panel fail and once full right deflection alert ammeter readings. Static zaps over my headset are an occasional norm and have been associated with diodes burning out in my Frantz annunciator DPU such that I have simply pulled it and hooked the cables up end to end to have an annunciator system without the audio stuff. I have tried running grounding cables from my fuselage to my wings and wings to control hinges where my static wick system is located and this has cleaned up the stormscope artifact to some degree but it still has alot much of the time and I get "Sensor Error" about half the time in flight where it won't give me any information at all. My unit is in with the BFG people now and they say it is OK and that it sounds like it is the noise in these composite planes that I am going to have to deal with to get it to work. They say the unit sends a test strike to the antenna every 3 seconds and something in the way of overwhelming noise must be interfering with its interrogating test causing it to give the Sensor Error. My cables are not coiled or bundled with other cables but my Ryan TCAD and WX 500 do sit side by side in my tail floor just aft my main wheel wells. I have had the plane skin mapped by Kirk Hammersmith and located the dome antenna accordingly but that is with the plane stationary on the ground and everything on. That is not moving, esp. thru moisture with static build up in the wings. I am told that the voltage that these planes can build flying thru the air is considerable and indeed if you exit the plane and touch one of the little paint crater areas after such a flight it shocks like the biggest kick you can generate with your rubber soled shoes on a carpet. I am concerned about the long term structural damage from continuing to fly and discharging into the atmosphere that such activity might lead to with my carbon structure let alone appearance. I would appreciate any insight or help from any one who can help me solve this problem. I cannot say that when I have flown and been in range of a thunderstorm on my stormscope that it has reliably shown it. Ben Welch N61BW 200 hours. benjamin.welch@carle.com