Return-Path: Received: from mail.eclipse.net ([207.207.192.13]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:04:21 -0500 Received: from bltinc.com (nyc1-03-135.eclipse.net [207.207.226.135]) by mail.eclipse.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA02324 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:06:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <36ED4B73.86E513D@bltinc.com> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:03:31 -0500 From: Ed McCauley Organization: Bottom Line Technologies Inc. To: "lancair.list@olsusa.com" Subject: Re: How hard is hard? References: <003801be6ee8$a801a260$4f3632cc@james.solect.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Hi group. In response to several posts about the accuracy of the Sticky Stuff Dispenser I too conducted ratio testing. At first it seemed that my dispenser was also "all over the place" :) Then I check with larger and larger (read more and more pumps) volumes and the ratios all came out near perfect. I concluded that the measuring resolution of my digital scale (0.2oz) was to blame for my initial results. I did not conduct tests at varying temperatures because mine vary very little. This is a critical thread (to all of us) so I'm most interested in the quantities you've measured and and the accuracy and resolution of your measuring device(s). The question: Are we chasing a ghost here? -- Ed McCauley Lancair IV-P Milford, NJ