Return-Path: Received: from olympus.net ([198.133.237.1]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 02:03:08 -0500 Received: from ptpm011.olympus.net ([198.133.237.41] helo=2thman) by olympus.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1) id 10MRQv-0005v3-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 23:05:06 -0800 From: "Barrett/Burns" <2thman@olympus.net> To: "Lancair List" Subject: Skin Sensitivity Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 23:08:05 -0800 Message-ID: <01be6eb2$92d1a740$3ded85c6@2thman> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To Bill Gradwohl, I just finished reading the book "It's all in your head. The link between Mercury Amalgams and Illness" by Dr. Hal A. Huggins. In it, "Bag Balm" is listed under "Veterinary preparations" as a source of = toxic Mercury along with scores of other things. It may help in one area, but = then may hurt in another. I just thought a warning was in order. Bill Gradwohl IV-P Builder You might be interested to know that Hal Huggins - a Colorado dentist - has, at least for a time, lost his license to practice dentitry for the approach he has taken with respect to mercury and his patients. He has been accused of being a quack and it has stuck - at least with all of mainstream, organized dentistry. While I certainly don't think modern science has all the answers on any subject, I would be very hesitant to use Hal Huggins as a source of scientific data. Check further - if you're still worried about Bag Balm, then by all means avoid it. Millions of farmers have been using it for the past century or so, I think. John Barrett, DDS