Return-Path: <rotaryeng@earthlink.net>
Received: from hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.22])
          by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219
          ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com
          for <marvkaye@olsusa.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:57:51 -0500
Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (pool017-max7.mpop2-ca-us.dialup.earthlink.net [207.217.241.67])
	by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA21447;
	Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Sender: root@hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net
Message-ID: <36E6C09D.679001C6@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:57:33 -0800
From: Paul <rotaryeng@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i686)
To: z <rotaryeng@earthlink.net>
Subject: Neil's bench test rig for testing radiators.
Mime-Version: 1.0

Jeff Spitzer wrote:
> 
> At 11:51 PM 3/9/99 -0800, you wrote:
> >According to to Kuchemann & Weber's book "The Aerodynamics Of
> >Propulsion". This is what the test duct should look like.
> >
>   Are we testing ducts or radiators?  I prefer to test them separately.
> The best way to test the radiator is to put nothing in front of it and a
> long straight duct behind it before SUCKING with the fan.  That's the best
> way to be sure you have uniform flow through the radiator.
> 
> Jeff Spitzer

They were joking Jeff. There will be no bench test. I agree on 
the sucking. How well does a squirrel cage fan work as a sucker?

PL
 
The Aircraft Rotary Engine Newsletter.              Powered by Linux.

http://home.earthlink.net/~rotaryeng/            http://www.linux.org