Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 12:02:56 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2429717@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <LHenney@dellepro.com>
Received: from [32.97.166.34] (HELO prserv.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b8)
  with ESMTP id 2429534 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 08:07:02 -0400
Received: from b8p5r1 (slip-12-64-198-50.mis.prserv.net[12.64.198.50])
          by prserv.net (out4) with SMTP
          id <2003061512070120404vh6s6e>; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 12:07:02 +0000
From: "Larry Henney" <LHenney@dellepro.com>
X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: 2003 AirVenture Cup - Lancair Racers
X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 07:09:30 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <000201c33336$fa6cf100$32c6400c@b8p5r1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-2427136@logan.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600


> few days ago.  But, if you run 320 cubes vs my 360 cubes
> roughly 8/9 of
> 16 GPH (14.2 gph)

>Interrrrresting.  I think that my current max power fuel flow of 15 gph
should be raised to 17 >gph.  I am guessing that all my mods are easily
getting me to 175-180 horspower.  If George is >right at about .6 BSFC
that would be 17-18 gph.

If this is all correct then I should be running about 19.7 gph.  The
problem here is that the tanks would then be empty upon arrival to
Dayton (not a good thing).  It does certainly suggest that I have quite
a wide range to work with however.

BTW, the cubes vs compression discussion was pallatable for this bear of
a wee little brain.  In short, it does change but it's negligible
compared to the power increase attained.

Larry Henney