Return-Path: Received: from centurion.flash.net ([209.30.0.22]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:58:33 -0500 Received: from flash.net (p16.amax1.dialup.sat1.flash.net [209.30.90.16]) by centurion.flash.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA19259; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:00:21 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <36DD78A6.87330705@flash.net> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 12:00:06 -0600 From: Ken Harwood To: Lancair List Subject: RE: Gross Weight. X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> An increase in gross weight also requires either more power or more runway, and don't forget density altitude. Taking off at Albuquerque with near 100 degrees while bumping the gross weight up will get your blood pumping before you get airborne or before you reach the end of the runway - whichever occurs first. I am running the 200 hp Lycoming IO360 with 10:1 pistons, etc., and I will tell you those little tires are really rotating by the time you get enough airspeed to fly. I have taken off there with a gross weight of, well let's say ABOVE 1800 lbs. I rotated at 95 mph and nothing happened, except that I stayed at 95 mph (no more acceleration). I lowered the nose back down and waited until 105 mph indicated before rotating again. This time she reluctantly took to the air. With a temperature of 95 degrees I will let you figure out how fast you are really traveling into a 5 kt. wind when liftoff occurs; and it isn't in the first 3000 ft of the runway either. Keep that CG forward too! No sense in getting airborne if the plane doesn't want to fly front wards anyway. I had much rather land the plane with the CG on the forward limit as take off with it on the rear limit. Ken, N15KH