Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 23:58:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [198.175.229.250] (HELO babbler.bmc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b2) with ESMTP id 2111852 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Apr 2003 19:19:47 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by babbler.bmc.com (8.10.2-BMC/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h39NKuJ19449 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:20:56 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: babbler.bmc.com: iscan owned process doing -bs Received: from pdavis.bmc.com (pdavis@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h39NJj507174 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:19:45 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <200304092319.h39NJj507174@localhost.localdomain> X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: pdavis owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Pgp-Action: PGP/MIME-signclear; rfc822=off; originator="Paul Davis " From: "Paul Davis" Reply-to: "Paul Davis" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Epoxy pump AR-100 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 03 Apr 2003 21:20:05 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Original-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 18:19:45 -0500 Several folks (Marv and Don come to mind) have recommended scales in lieu of epoxy pumps. Appeals to me, so I've been shopping. Marv seems satisfied with the Ohaus Scout (300G capacity with 0.1 resolution). I'm also looking at the Ohaus CS200 (200G capacity with 0.1G resolution and 0.1G accuracy (for $68.00). I think most of these scales do "tare to capacity by subtraction" which I understand to mean you can tare up to the capacity of the scale in multiple steps. So I could put an empty container on the scale, tare to 0, weigh resin, tare to 0, weigh hardener, all without removing the container from the scale -- so long as the total of container, resin and hardener is less than the capacity of the scale. Is that the way "tare to capacity by subtraction" works? We have the fast-build Legacy and did the one week workshop so most of the big volume steps are complete. And of course we could always just measure several cups individually and then mix. My question is what capacity scale do we really need? My instinct is to go with "just big enough" on the assumption that I'll get best accuracy. Any thoughts, recommendation or regrets? ------------------- Potest ex casa magnus vir exire A great man can come from a hut Arguments are repl Aviation/Lancair/List /home/pdavis/Mail/drafts/332