Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #18404
From: Tom Gourley <res18fcm@verizon.net>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: FG Legacy vs. RV-7A
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 23:33:47 -0400
To: <lml>
Some comments on the comparison of the Lancair Sport (FG Legacy) and the RV-7A.
 
The kit price of $17,000 for the 7A is for the standard kit.  The quick build is $25,050. 
 
Van's site says the standard RV-7A should take about 1800 hours to build, the quick build (they claim) should be roughly half that. (Never heard of one being built that fast.)  Why such a high estimate (2500 hours) for building the Sport?  I would think it should be faster to build than the Legacy.  My guess is the Sport and the fast build 7A will take about the same amount of time to build.
 
Need to be more specific on the engine comparison.  An IO-360 could be a 200 hp angle valve or a 180 hp parallel valve.  I live in the heart of RV country (Van belongs to the same EAA chapter that I do -- 105) and I've found that a lot of RV builders go for used engines, either running them for a while as is or doing a lot of overhaul work themselves.  If you do the same with the sport the engine cost should come out the same for either aircraft, and potentially a lot less than the $38,500 shown in the comparison.  Used angle valve IO-360s are probably easier to come by than the parallel valve.  The angle valve was used in a lot of production aircraft and has not been in nearly as much demand, so far, in the kit market as the parallel valve.
 
So, using the same engine, same prop, same panel, same paint, the only real cost difference should be the airframe kit.  If you compare with the fastbuild -7A that's a difference of $7850.  The -7A is a darn good airplane, but I'd rather build, and fly, the Lancair.
 
Tom Gourley
Banks, OR
L2K #122
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster