Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [209.26.2.158] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.6)
  with HTTP id 2055018 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:25:49 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: temperature probes
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.6
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:25:49 -0500
Message-ID: <web-2055018@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <NCBBKKMDBDCIKLFDJIOOMECEEEAA.rpastusek@htii.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Bob Pastusek" <rpastusek@htii.com>:

    Guys,

    I just completed a re-read of Bob Nuckols' excellent Chapter 16 in the
AeroElectric Connection on Electromagnetic Compatibility in preparation for
our Fast Build Panel week (concept test) at Lancair with Kirk Hammersmith
and his team. I expect you're ahead of me on this, but if you haven't done
so, it's a fairly short piece and a good primer on these kinds of things.

    Bob Pastusek

    In a message dated 3/15/2003 8:39:10 PM Central Standard Time,
glcasey@adelphia.net writes:


      I have taken apart a Vision fuel probe and was amazed to
      find that there was no, and I mean none, EMI protection built into the
      circuitry, so that might give one a clue about the protection, or lack
      thereof in the rest of the system.