Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:38:43 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.8.50.175] (HELO mta1.adelphia.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 2053603 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:13:46 -0500 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by mta1.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with SMTP id <20030315151739.YOPM25645.mta1.adelphia.net@worldwinds> for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:17:39 -0500 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: temperature probes X-Original-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 07:10:07 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 <> I don't know too much about this system, but I'm assuming the probes are all thermocouples. I have taken apart a Vision fuel probe and was amazed to find that there was no, and I mean none, EMI protection built into the circuitry, so that might give one a clue about the protection, or lack thereof in the rest of the system. For thermocouple leads one could build a filter circuit and place it just outside the box and see if it makes a difference. A fairly simple one would be a 1K resistor in each lead with a 0.1 mfd capacitor between the leads on the box side of the resistors. The resistors might affect the reading a little, but probably won't. Try doing that on one and see what happens. Problem is that if it works you need to protect all of them, a really messy task. Easy to design into the box, but messy to fit after the fact. Another thought is just to twist the thermocouple wire pairs along their whole length to make a poor man's shielded wire. The RFI might be conducted in through the power leads of the box, but I would expect then it would affect more than just temperature measurements. Or it could be directly radiated through the face of the display into the box, as that is probably the least well protected part. The JPI in my certificated aircraft seems to work flawlessly so I plan to use theirs in my ES. Gary Casey