Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:29:32 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from JSC-EMS-VWS04.jsc.nasa.gov ([139.169.39.51] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with SMTP id 2042659 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:05:26 -0500 Received: from 139.169.16.59 by JSC-EMS-VWS04.jsc.nasa.gov (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:05:24 -0600 Received: by jsc-smtp01.jsc.nasa.gov with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:05:24 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <1BA6584C4F38B34E845D453EFBEAAA9D8757C0@jsc-mail06.jsc.nasa.gov> From: "THORN, ALLYSON A. (JSC-OD) (NASA)" X-Original-To: 'Lancair Mailing List' , 'Pat Cohenour' Subject: RE: [LML] digital levels X-Original-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:05:22 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPartTM-000-519824b2-d576-4352-8a76-78d6a68257ec" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------=_NextPartTM-000-519824b2-d576-4352-8a76-78d6a68257ec Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2E1E1.C0207900" ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2E1E1.C0207900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Pat, We have a Checkpoint Inclo-Matic 675-05 model digital level. We sent it back to the manufacturer for repair/recalibration after about 2 weeks of trying to use it. We were constantly recalibrating it because it was pretty erratic - it would jump about +/- 10 degrees from angle measurement. The manufacturer told us they repaired it and sent it back to us on 2/26/03. When we get it, we'll let you know the performance. Allyson Thorn Legacy #173 Does anyone have any feedback about the Checkpoint Inclo-Matic 670 model digital level? Thanks Pat Cohenour ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2E1E1.C0207900 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Message
Pat,
 
We have a Checkpoint Inclo-Matic 675-05 model digital level.  We sent it back to the manufacturer for repair/recalibration after about 2 weeks of trying to use it.  We were constantly recalibrating it because it was pretty erratic - it would jump about +/- 10 degrees from angle measurement.  The manufacturer told us they repaired it and sent it back to us on 2/26/03.  When we get it, we'll let you know the performance.
 
Allyson Thorn
Legacy #173

 
Does anyone have any feedback about the Checkpoint Inclo-Matic 670 model digital level? 
 
Thanks
 
Pat Cohenour
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2E1E1.C0207900-- ------=_NextPartTM-000-519824b2-d576-4352-8a76-78d6a68257ec--