Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 09:04:07 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2040621@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <Newlan2dl@aol.com>
Received: from imo-m08.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.163] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6)
  with ESMTP id 2040546 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 04:57:02 -0500
Received: from Newlan2dl@aol.com
	by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id q.f.b929d2a (4004)
	 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 04:56:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Newlan2dl@aol.com
X-Original-Message-ID: <f.b929d2a.2b91dde9@aol.com>
X-Original-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 04:56:57 EST
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: proper toque values/calibration
X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10637

Thanks Craig

For what it's worth, I got an email back from Vern at Lancair and he also 
believes it's worth it to calibrate.  Have you had first hand experience in 
seeing how accurate (or not) wrenches can be?

I'll check out the site.

Dan