Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 22:37:21 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2013155@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <jbp@fire.phys.cmu.edu>
Received: from fire.phys.cmu.edu ([128.2.26.129] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5)
  with ESMTP id 2013171 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 22:33:00 -0500
Received: from localhost (jbp@localhost)
	by fire.phys.cmu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h193Wgd20642
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 22:32:42 -0500
X-Original-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 22:32:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Jeffrey Peterson <jbp@fire.phys.cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: lancair mail list <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE LNC2 extended wing tanks.
X-Original-Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302082222580.20611-100000@fire.phys.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


LML,

Thanks for all the opinions about tank extension.

I didnt explain in the original post that my gaol is to delete the header
tank, not to increase the total fuel capacity.  I might someday 
cross the Atlantic in the 360, but I would use a ferry tank for that.

I also didn't mention that the plane is not yet painted.

No one responded who had actaully been through the process on a close-out
wing, so I guess I will be a pioneer.  I'll try to take photos and post 
them.

Thanks again,

-Jeff