Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:56:14 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.34] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 1996256 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:11:23 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.10d.1ea75e44 (30960) for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:11:19 -0500 (EST) From: RWolf99@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <10d.1ea75e44.2b61dea7@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:11:19 EST Subject: LNC2 Nose Gear X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 108 Scott Krueger writes: <<425 sits on the nose gear which is at about 12* (I think?) rake, thus applying some "pull apart force" on the link. Also, upon gear retraction, the nose is the last to come up because of gas spring pressure adding to the pull required. During flight, main links hold up their weight, nose holds up its weight on a longer arm plus force of gas spring. Am I overy cautious?>> Ahh, no. I forgot about those things. The static load on the parked nose gear does, in fact, apply a small tensile load. I would not worry about that. Also, if you bang the nose gear on it's side while landing (and we all will) then the side load should be absorbed by the blocks attaching it to the engine mount, but there could concievably be some bending applied to the postulated rod end bearing. Still, I don't think that would hurt anything since some relief is allowed for by the rotational freedom of the spherical rod end bearing. So I think we're okay there, too. The gas strut attaches at the "knee" of the drag link (as I recall -- the airplane is in the garage and I'm at work pretending to be busy) so the gas strut loads don't go into the rod end at all. My brain is full today. I don't want to dig into this when there's a talented and energetic youngster (Tim Ong) chomping at the bit (I hope). But if Tim is too busy then I guess I can whip up something. I'd find a steel rod end bearing that had an equivalent bending strength to the drag link at the point of connection. Then I'd model the amputated drag link in our CAD system here at work (if I can figure out how) and try to run the stress analysis package (yuk) and see how it turns out. Then go over to the local machine shop and get a quote on several of these. Not what I really wanted to do, but if nobody else picks up the ball I guess I'll have to... - Rob Wolf Lazy Slob (at least today)