Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:19:47 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 1992689 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:58:56 -0500 Received: from Newlan2dl@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.71.2c12bea3 (4328) for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:58:54 -0500 (EST) From: Newlan2dl@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <71.2c12bea3.2b5c4f6d@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:58:53 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Theilert Centurion 4.0 Engines For Lancairs? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10637 Hi Valen I haven't seen the Thielert engine but I have flown in the SMA engine powered C182 and have some data that is pertinent. One is that so far, all of the diesel powered planes will be turbo'd (great news!) but if you have an engine out above 15,000', they can't restart if they get cold. Remember that they are compression ignition systems and without enough air to compress at higher altitude, no ignition. All are working on solutions so don't be too worried yet. The other thing (at least told to me by SMA), is that they require a LOT more air to cool them than do gasoline engines. The C!82 had a new LARGE intake that was BUTT UGLY!!! It doubled the intake size and if this has to be done on the gorgeous lines of my Lancair, I'll take gasoline. But this too may be solved elsewhere. On the plus side, it was no noisier inside than the typical Witchita Spam can and outside with a 2200 RPM rotational speed, the prop was quieter and more efficient...once the correct prop was tweeked. Note that a new prop will have to be designed for it because the lower RPM and superior efficiencies won't be realized until the correct prop is on it. All the stuff you mentioned is correct. I did some calculations extrapolatiing given data from the HP and speed for the ES and Super ES and given HP reduction at altitude. If the turbo is capable of giving 300 HP at 10,000' (an increase of 34% over the IO-550), the plane should realize just under a 10% increase in speed. That is it should cruise at almost 210 kts. The range at economy cruise should be close to 2000 miles with extended range tanks. Of course you also need to consider that Jet A is much heavier than gasoline so you may loose some payload with full tanks. Dan Newland Super ES