Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:40:55 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r09.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.105] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 1991668 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:05:46 -0500 Received: from RicArgente@cs.com by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.12f.20a2d587 (4410) for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:05:39 -0500 (EST) From: RicArgente@cs.com X-Original-Message-ID: <12f.20a2d587.2b59f453@cs.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:05:39 EST Subject: Re: [LML] LNCR Tail Flutter X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_12f.20a2d587.2b59f453_boundary" X-Mailer: CompuServe 7.0 for Windows US sub 10503 --part1_12f.20a2d587.2b59f453_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 1/17/2003 12:34:44 PM Eastern Standard Time, gary21sn@hotmail.com writes: > a couple of cases of "small tail" flutter, but never heard about possible > "large tail" flutter. A couple? Gary, please refresh my memory cause I can't recall ever reading anything regarding a Lancair actually experiencing flutter. Also, IMHO, the MK-II tail flutter 'FIX' is not required nor is it necessary... Rick Argente N360ZR LNC2 450 'Flutterless' Hours MKII Tail --part1_12f.20a2d587.2b59f453_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 1/17/2003 12:34:44 PM Eastern Standard Time, gary21sn@hotmail.com writes:
a couple of cases of "small tail" flutter, but never heard about possible "large tail" flutter. 


A couple?  Gary, please refresh my memory cause I can't recall ever reading anything regarding a Lancair actually experiencing flutter. 


Also, IMHO, the MK-II tail flutter 'FIX' is not required nor is it necessary... 

Rick Argente
N360ZR LNC2
450 'Flutterless' Hours
MKII Tail --part1_12f.20a2d587.2b59f453_boundary--