Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 17:42:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com ([204.127.202.63] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 1932681 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 06:38:59 -0500 Received: from attbi.com (h0050e4f9850f.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.42.21]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with SMTP id <2002122211385900300lovdme>; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 11:38:59 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <3E05A025.F0D44489@attbi.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 06:21:09 -0500 From: "Angier M. Ames" Reply-To: N2811A@attbi.com Organization: Alpha Delta Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: LCN2 fuel system References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am planning to install a T fitting on the IN side of each of my two Facet fuel pumps and run a short crossover aluminum line connecting the these two fittings. The purpose here is to provide a connection between the two wing tanks so that if one pump fails, the other will continue to pull fuel from both wings. I believe that some of you have installed a ball valve in this line so that if for any reason one wing tank needed to be drained, the other tank would be isolated. My inclination would be to leave this valve normally open so that each pump would be feeding the header tank from both wings at all times. Do any of you see a problem here? Question: Is there any benefit to having this ball valve readily accessible in flight from the cockpit? Happy Holidays! Angier Ames