Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 07:20:00 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1912507@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <rlg34@attbi.com>
Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com ([204.127.202.61] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2)
  with ESMTP id 1912089 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:17:42 -0500
Received: from primary (12-234-209-102.client.attbi.com[12.234.209.102])
          by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with SMTP
          id <2002121521173700100q8oqbe>; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:17:37 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <002601c2a47f$8b3fa0c0$66d1ea0c@attbi.com>
From: "Larry Graves" <rlg34@attbi.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1911968@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Windshield Goo
X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:18:40 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Both will work, but the best stuff out there is "3M Adhesive Remover" which
will not harm acrylic. It looks and smells suspiciously like paint thinner,
but is not.

Best,

Larry Graves

> Rumor has it that masking tape goo on the windows can be removed with a
small
> amount of 100LL.  Another rumor says that WD40 will do the trick.  Can
anyone
> verify or disprove? Thanks, Bill Hogarty