Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:12:45 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1888156@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <VTAILJEFF@aol.com>
Received: from imo-m02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.5] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1)
  with ESMTP id 1888158 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:09:46 -0500
Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com
	by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.199.1146b77b (16781)
	 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:09:41 -0500 (EST)
From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com
X-Original-Message-ID: <199.1146b77b.2b163a35@aol.com>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:09:41 EST
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: flight instruction in new Lancairs
X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113


 >>>SNIP>>Keep in mind Advisory Circulars are NOT regulatory.They are only 
advisory as their name implies. I have been trying to download the referenced 
FAA Order 8130.2, but find it to be unavailable at this time.<<SNIP<<


Sounds like a good argument for the NTSB Administrative Law Judge-- hmmmm I 
wonder if anyone has used that argument in an enforcement before AND WON???

Jeff Edwards