Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:28:35 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [32.97.166.31] (HELO prserv.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1881923 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:12:48 -0500 Received: from oemcomputer (slip-12-65-211-22.mis.prserv.net[12.65.211.22]) by prserv.net (out1) with SMTP id <2002111916124220104tm457e>; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:12:42 +0000 From: "Larry Henney" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Better brakes fo ES X-Original-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:12:09 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <000a01c28fe6$6a14e700$16d3410c@oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 > original Matco brake pads. Should I change the pads to > Cleveland pads now or > wait until the Matco pads are worn out? What is the observed Dan, Just to let you know there are a few devils advocates on the list I've got 314 hours on my 360 Matco breaks. As yet I've not changed the pads. I will however probably go to Clevelands during my next annual when they need changing. My personal opinion is that riding breaks causes glazing and premature failure. Perhaps this is part of the bad rap that Matco constantly receives. Use'm for a while. They've got a little service life. Larry Henney N360LH LNC2 IO-360 B1 16XS Ft Worth, TX