Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:01:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1881827 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:57:07 -0500 Received: from 208-58-228-52.s52.tnt1.nrfl.va.dialup.rcn.com ([208.58.228.52] helo=DCT0D611) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 18E8s4-0005CM-00 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:56:57 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <008801c28fd2$138cbd90$34e43ad0@DCT0D611> From: "Bill & Sue" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Experimental Identification X-Original-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:32:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0049_01C28FA6.2C976E60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C28FA6.2C976E60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Unless it is stated elsewhere in the FARs, FAR 91.319-d3 clearly states = that we only have to identify ourselves as 'experimental' to the control = tower. This excludes approach/departure control, center, etc. Is this = a correct assesment?=20 Hi Rick, I think that you're pretty much correct with the possible exception that = "approach control" is technically part of the "tower". Any controllers = in our midst to give a definitive answer? Bill =20 harrelson@erols.com N5ZQ LNC2 O-320 VA42 Fredericksburg, VA ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C28FA6.2C976E60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Unless it is stated elsewhere in the FARs, FAR = 91.319-d3=20 clearly states that we only have to identify ourselves as 'experimental' = to the=20 control tower.  This excludes approach/departure control, center, = etc.=20  Is this a correct assesment?
 
 
 
Hi Rick,
 
I think that you're pretty much correct with the = possible=20 exception that "approach control" is technically part of the "tower". = Any=20 controllers in our midst to give a definitive = answer?
 
Bill   
harrelson@erols.com=
N5ZQ  LNC2  O-320  VA42  = Fredericksburg,=20 VA
------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C28FA6.2C976E60--