Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:02:22 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([65.115.173.155] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1871150 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:16:30 -0500 Received: from hagus.bright.net ([209.143.0.74]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:06:40 -0500 Received: from bright.net (paul-cas1-cs-24.dial.bright.net [216.201.47.31]) by hagus.bright.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id gAF0G0LL004947 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:16:02 -0500 (EST) X-Original-Message-ID: <3DD43CDA.6E34E018@bright.net> X-Original-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:16:26 -0500 From: J H Webb X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: "(Lancair Mailing List)" Subject: Slow down techniques Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi First let me say that using high rpm (low Pitch) and low MP is very hard on the engine. This is usually one of the most critical tests during engine certification. It is called the gas load test and puts very high loads on the engine in a way that the engine is not really designed to withstand. This is from 4 years of experimental flight test on certificated engines or soon to be certificated. I worked for a major airframe manufacturer in the past. Now for the best slow down technique, I would recommend for long engine life and the lowest noise level on the ground (this is now becoming a major design point) reducing power smoothly and slowly to 16" about 6 miles from the landing airfield at pattern altitude. This will give flap and gear speed at the airport. In addition it saves fuel and wear and tear on the airplane. The 6 miles works well for the the 320/360 and use 8 to 9 miles for the IV or IVP. The engine cool down is gradual and the ride is quiet to the airport. Opposite your landing spot drop your landing gear, drop the MP to 12" and finish your check list Don't reduce power further until you have full flaps and idle at touchdown. Interestingly I have found that speed brakes added in the late flair 20' or so above the ground reduces your landing roll for the IV/IVP about 200' with the same or no braking (depending on RW length). As most pilots with lots of high performance time (Jets and Props) speed brakes in flight are poor planning or ATC problems, since they cost you fuel and can stick up in a variety of situations. Most recently I have experienced this problem (stickup in a IVP). The speed brakes were sent back and when returned still would stick up over 140 kts if deployed above 225 kts. Icing is another time to be very careful with speed brakes as installed on most Lancairs. Jack Webb L 360, L IV ATP, Ohio