Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 22:14:56 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r09.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.105] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0) with ESMTP id 1855848 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 21:30:26 -0500 Received: from Billhogarty@aol.com by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.154.1721cad3 (4592) for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:30:24 -0500 (EST) From: Billhogarty@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <154.1721cad3.2afc7bbf@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:30:23 EST Subject: Re: [LML] S-Tec, part 2 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_154.1721cad3.2afc7bbf_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10638 --part1_154.1721cad3.2afc7bbf_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit For Jack Cowell: Been following the discussion on the autopilot, but missed out on the resistor change. Assuming that this is an STEC-55 we are discussing, can you tell me which resistor you are refering to and where located. Thanks, Bill Hogarty L-IVP @ 96% --part1_154.1721cad3.2afc7bbf_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit For Jack Cowell:

Been following the discussion on the autopilot, but missed out on the resistor change.

Assuming that this is an STEC-55 we are discussing, can you tell me which resistor you are refering to and where located. Thanks, Bill Hogarty L-IVP @ 96% --part1_154.1721cad3.2afc7bbf_boundary--