Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:08:00 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [65.173.216.73] (HELO picker.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0) with ESMTP id 1844008 for lml@lancair.net; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:07:39 -0400 Received: from [144.54.52.3] (HELO logan.ct.picker.com) by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1) with SMTP id 15769996 for lml@lancair.net; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:07:38 -0400 Received: by logan.ct.picker.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA28047; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:04:15 -0400 X-Original-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:04:15 -0400 From: rob@ct.picker.com (Rob Logan) X-Original-Message-Id: <200210241504.LAA28047@logan.ct.picker.com> X-Original-To: lml@lancair.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Intercom [Markers] > I had to have some sort of Distance to make an ILS legal. you must be able to identify the IAF... I've seen more that require an ADF http://rob.com/airports/ils/LEW_ir4.GIF http://rob.com/airports/ils/LEB_ir18.GIF ADF but there are some that require DME http://rob.com/airports/ils/LEX_ir4.GIF http://rob.com/airports/ils/LUK_ir21L.GIF so if you want to go down this road, an ADF would open more ILSs for you, but a better way to go is an IFR GPS. maybe the cheaper enroute / terminal will be good enough as a replacement to the ADF / DME requirement. http://www.rduafss.faa.gov/navaids/gps.htm A beep beep at the MM is nice but no plates require it... in the old days you could get an extra 50 feet lower, but now you can do the same once you see the PAPIs