Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:02:02 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [32.97.166.32] (HELO prserv.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0) with ESMTP id 1843734 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:51:42 -0400 Received: from oemcomputer (slip-12-64-204-51.mis.prserv.net[12.64.204.51]) by prserv.net (out2) with SMTP id <2002102402514120201hu435e>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 02:51:41 +0000 From: "Larry Henney" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Intercom [AVIONICS] [AIRPLANES] [FLIGHT] X-Original-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 21:50:13 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <000e01c27b08$14e1eaa0$33cc400c@oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Rob Writes > 2. What do you do about a marker beacon receiver? skip it... the days of getting an extra 50feet on the ILS are over and GPS distance is better. heck, who wants another antenna slowing you down any ways? Rob, I was under the impression that I had to have some sort of Distance to make an ILS legal. That is; required items include localizer, glideslope, & DME (or marker beacon). I came to the conclusion that I'd put the marker antenna internally on the baggage floor for legality, safety, and all around cheap guy factor. Then my VFR GPS could augment my safety for distance purposes. This I arrived at because at the time I thought DME was very expensive duplication of a VFR GPS and the marker beacon would be a legal substitution for many approaches. Is / Was my logic flawed? Thanks in advance for your thoughts. Larry Henney N360LH LNC2 IO-360 B1 16XS Ft Worth, TX