Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0)
  with HTTP id 1843745 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:01:24 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Propellor Recommendation For IV-P With TSIO-550
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:01:24 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1843745@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <3DB75DD6.9030608@lvcm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for rickschrameck <rickschrameck@lvcm.com>:
Ed,
I have flown and tested both props and the numbers are accurate.  I am the one 
that did the testing.  What is your application and what are you looking for 
in performance?  Maybe I can be of some help.

Rick Schrameck


>I have looked at the AeroComposite, the Hartzell standard 3-blade and 
>the Hartzell Scimitar (sp?).  There are reports of 18 knots increase 
>with the AeroComposite and 15 knots with the Hartzell Scimitar (sp).  
>Which one is the prop of choice?