Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 04:28:10 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from fl-mta01.durocom.com ([216.53.195.242] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b9) with ESMTP id 1804375 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 01:07:57 -0400 Received: from [209.42.186.131] by fl-mta01.durocom.com with ESMTP id <20021013050757.BYSI16017.fl-mta01@[209.42.186.131]> for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 01:07:57 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.5 X-Original-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 00:07:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [LML] Splitting The List From: Dane White X-Original-To: "(Lancair Mailing List)" X-Original-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Marv, Change is difficult to swallow, but what you propose should satisfy everyone on the list. I say give it a go, and I think your naysayers will come around. They can always remain subscribed to the same old "mother" list after all! Throwing away my buggy whip, -Dane -- Dane White Murfreesboro TN LIVP > From: "Marvin Kaye" > Reply-To: (Lancair Mailing List) > Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 20:06:26 -0400 > To: (Lancair Mailing List) > Subject: [LML] Splitting The List > > Well, that about covers it. I'm still testing and tweaking and am not ready > to actually turn all of this on yet, but I wanted you to know what's going on > and invite your comments and questions. And let's talk about it in the open, > that way we can all understand what's happening. Fire away........