Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:22:34 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vineyard.net ([204.17.195.90] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b9) with ESMTP id 1802858 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:33:23 -0400 Received: from direct (FSY20.VINEYARD.NET [66.101.65.20]) by vineyard.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1862991D51 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:33:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <002601c270ce$fb425f00$14416542@direct> From: "Ted Stanley" X-Original-To: "Mail List Lancair" Subject: re: Splitting up the list? X-Original-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:36:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 My vote ...... Don't split the list. I DO however quite agree with Marv, it would be most helpful if all who post INCLUDE the particular model Lancair and/or powerplant they are discussing and or operate. Marv, it may be a fruitless effort but how about defining specific codes or abbreviations for given Lancair models ? Examples might be ES - 550G IV - TSIO550E IVP - NSY (not sure yet) L - 550N 360 - IO360 It also might be nice if posters were to always sign their posts with the same name. Ted Stanley IV-NSY