Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:47:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from m3.boston.juno.com ([64.136.24.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b9) with SMTP id 1802855 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:30:18 -0400 Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookie.juno.com for <"7LRIubhLn1VLcKB8GrXnbRmJuVgqJzshdPu4H0wfbm1pisyUqWsNFcc1KqPfOrqa"> Received: (from earl_schroeder@juno.com) by m3.bos.untd.com (jqueuemail) id HETBMSDL; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:29:46 EDT X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net X-Original-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:20:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [LML] A vote not to split the list X-Original-Message-ID: <20021010.212027.-16385371.1.Earl_Schroeder@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.27 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-5,7 From: earl_schroeder@juno.com If votes are being counted.... I agree with Dan. I routinely check the author first and then decide if to read or skip....... regardless of subject line. Earl 235/320 >On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:42:23 -0400 Dan O'Brien writes: > If the lists are split, I would vote to have a list that posts ALL posts so > that someone who wants all posts can go to one list...if that's possible.