Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0b8)
  with HTTP id 1796816 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 08:29:14 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: FW: [LML] Re: L-IV-P elevator sensitivity
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b8
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 08:29:14 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1796816@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <001a01c26acb$2f5b4090$0f01a8c0@P4DESKTOP>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Douglas W. Johnson, MD" <Lancair1@bellsouth.net>:

Perhaps "scared" was not quite the word I was seeking; rather "surprised and
unprepared" would be more like it, when I was first given the controls in my
flight as co-pilot.  I accidently sneezed and was up 150ft!  Make no
mistake, my grin was ear to ear.  My point was rather that in comparison to
the light control feel in the 320, the control harmony in the IV is not that
far off most production aircraft, and should not IMHO be cause for enough
consternation to require major modifications to correct, as the reader was
wondering.
Doug Johnson


>>I would like to ask Dr. Johnson to elaborate a bit on what "scared" him
during his flight in the 320 original (small) tail.<<