Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 12:14:53 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r04.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.100] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1796113 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 12:08:54 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.17d.f77c167 (30960) for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:06:10 -0400 (EDT) From: RWolf99@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <17d.f77c167.2acc7371@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:06:09 EDT Subject: Stick Displacement Correction X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 108 I made a slight mistake in yesterday's posting about increasing stick forces by moving the pushrod attach location inward towards the axis of rotation. If you move the attach point inwards, you get MORE surface deflection for a given stick deflection, not LESS. However, we don't actually fly using stick DEFLECTION as feedback, we use stick FORCE. The stick force will increase if you move the attach point inwards, and that's the important part. - Rob Wolf