Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 15:04:29 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1795455@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <harrelson@erols.com>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.60] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8)
  with ESMTP id 1795452 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 14:55:44 -0400
Received: from 216-164-236-254.s254.tnt3.frdb.va.dialup.rcn.com ([216.164.236.254] helo=OFFICE)
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 17wSBM-0005Bx-00
	for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 14:55:44 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <0faa01c2697c$62970200$cd9f3bd0@OFFICE>
From: "Bill & Sue" <harrelson@erols.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1795428@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2 small tail "sensitivity"
X-Original-Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:57:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

I've got the small tail 320 and love it. I've flown both and if I were
building again...I'd still go with the small tail.

Bill
harrelson@erols.com
N5ZQ  LNC2  O-320  VA42   small tail