Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:28:52 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1792868@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <gwbraly@gami.com>
Received: from [65.66.11.38] (HELO qbert.gami.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8)
  with ESMTP id 1792866 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:17:00 -0400
Received: by QBERT with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <TTQ1SLKL>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:18:44 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <52548863F8A5D411B530005004759A931C2ED3@QBERT>
From: George Braly <gwbraly@gami.com>
X-Original-To: "'lml@lancaironline.net'" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: V8 engines
X-Original-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:18:39 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"




>> One engine monitor company I spoke to had measured the differential in
heat in 
one installation that had a 100 degree F difference from the (right side) 
sensor on the 2 o'clock than the 10 o'clock, (the higher temp).  This would 
vary from plane to plane but the point is that the aircooled engines all
will 
have a larger difference from the hot areas to the cool and the Tg is going 
to play Havock with the differences between the two.<<


Dan, 

Any idea who this "engine monitor company" might have been that you spoke to
and that did that rather novel and useful research?

Regards,  George