Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:28:37 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1792878@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <gwbraly@gami.com>
Received: from [65.66.11.38] (HELO qbert.gami.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8)
  with ESMTP id 1792865 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:13:31 -0400
Received: by QBERT with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <TTQ1SLKG>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:15:14 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <52548863F8A5D411B530005004759A931C2ED2@QBERT>
From: George Braly <gwbraly@gami.com>
X-Original-To: "'lml@lancaironline.net'" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] V8 engines
X-Original-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:15:03 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1252"


>>The liquid vs. air cooling is a fairly close call.  Air cooling requires
less coolant weight (about 20 pounds less), but it requires that the engine
be much more bulky and consequently heavier than an equivalent liquid-cooled
engine.<<

Which of course, is the reason why the TCM liquid cooled engines weigh so
much less and occupy so much less bulk than do the air-cooled engines.
Right?