Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:33:31 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1790955@logan.com>
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] CO detectors
X-Original-To: "Gary Wirrell" <gary@aerotronics.com>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b8
X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:33:10 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <web-1790953@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <NEBBIHDFALMJHPAMLCMEGEDLCIAA.gary@aerotronics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Gary Wirrell" <gary@aerotronics.com>:

Answer = http://www.coguardian.com/

-----Original Message-----
>>>As far as a reliable and reasonably priced electronic CO detectors
go...which one is the best bang for the buck?<<<