Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:17:21 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([209.26.218.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1790696 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:59:28 -0400 Received: from ncsmtp03.ogw.rr.com ([24.93.67.84]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:50:47 -0400 Received: from mail8.sc.rr.com (fe8 [24.93.67.55]) by ncsmtp03.ogw.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8P4GfjD006917 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:19:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from impact.sc.rr.com ([24.88.99.169]) by mail8.sc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:18:04 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020925001646.00b44478@pop-server.sc.rr.com> X-Sender: sreeves@pop-server.sc.rr.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:17:55 -0400 X-Original-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: Steve Reeves Subject: CO detectors Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed As far as a reliable and reasonably priced electronic CO detectors go...which one is the best bang for the buck. I'm going to pick one up...tired of that little tab always flying around the cockpit. Steve