Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 07:49:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r04.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.100] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7) with ESMTP id 1721257 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 02:43:00 -0400 Received: from Newlan2dl@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.) id q.168.132d1c6f (3924) for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 02:42:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Newlan2dl@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <168.132d1c6f.2aa70571@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 02:42:57 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Aircraft Log X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10512 Hi Rob The reason your Cessna 150 doesn't have or require logs like the homebuilts is that they (The type certificate holder, Cessna) has a production system and QC system that satisfied the FAA that Cessna could build aircraft identical (or nearly so within limits defined by Cessna and agreed to by the FAA) to the first one certificated of that type. All production stages have to be performed by a Cessna emplyee and signed off by an inspector and any stage may be inspected by the FAA or a representative. Your plane will have a log on record at Cessna that showed when each part was built and signed off, what engine it had in it, weight and balance, etc. Dan Newland