Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.173.216.66] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0b7)
  with HTTP id 1720737 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 10:25:12 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Aviation vs. Automotive oil
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b7
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 10:25:12 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1720737@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <001701c25354$c4d8b550$6403a7c0@gamarrdesk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Giffen A. Marr" <gamarr@charter.net>:

The requirement for oil qualification of each type of engine is an
expensive process. My guess is that the expense of qualification does
not warrant the effort. I would think that the current crop of synthetic
oils would be far superior to current aviation approved oils.

Giff Marr