Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:05:22 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.4.19.34] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7) with ESMTP id 1720147 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 23:26:55 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 20:26:56 -0700 Received: from 68.97.130.75 by lw12fd.law12.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 03:26:55 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.97.130.75] From: "Ron Laughlin" X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net X-Original-Bcc: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2 tail X-Original-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 22:26:55 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Original-Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Sep 2002 03:26:56.0169 (UTC) FILETIME=[96CC8990:01C25230] >The rudder leading edge should be slightly wider than the trailing edge of >the vertical stabilizer. If narrower, the airflow breaks at VS trailing >and Scott, Please quantify "slightly wider". I was under the impression that level (same width at leading and trailing edge) was ok as long as the interface gap was small (<1.5mm). In fact, I closed my elevator/HS and rudder/VS at the factory quick build shop and I was instructed to build them that way. Did I misunderstand? Ron Laughlin _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com