Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 02:06:40 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1714496@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <martell@worldnet.att.net>
Received: from [204.127.131.49] (HELO mtiwmhc21.worldnet.att.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7)
  with ESMTP id 1714337 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:47:14 -0400
Received: from aml ([12.87.136.38]) by mtiwmhc21.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP
          id <20020829234714.SZV23721.mtiwmhc21.worldnet.att.net@aml>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 23:47:14 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <000b01c24fb6$72dca460$2688570c@aml>
From: "martell lindsay" <martell@worldnet.att.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: [LML] Re: On the subject of comm antennas...
X-Original-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:47:23 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

>>
I wondered if anyone has experience with the RST 
copper foil tape comm antennas. They are cheap, easy 
to make (installed 3 so far) and very light. 
Can anyone share some performance info? 
<<


I have had mine (NAV, COM, ELT & transponder) in for five years.
I can't say enough good things.

Do it like Jim says and enjoy.

martell lindsay
N360ML